1 · Displacement and tracking
Desired, command, measured, and comparable original/proposed responses
GPT-5.6.4 OSI and authority study
Original and proposed estimators are compared on the same ten FABLE cases and two experimental tests, with tracking, NCF margin, and controller authority kept on one synchronized time axis.
- Data
- Loading
- Cases
- —
- Canonical suite
- —
- Fabby score
- —
- Overall
- —
Twelve-case comparison
Select a case, then hover any plot for synchronized values. Use the mouse wheel to zoom in time, drag to pan, double-click to reset, and click a legend entry to hide or restore that trace.
Shared time view
Waiting for report data
Run the study to generate report_data.js.
2 · Normalized coprime-factor margin
Original and proposed OSI with reference and proposed estimator constituents
3 · Authority and diagnostic gain
Authority uses the left scale; diagnostic gain uses the right scale
Acceptance
The table is populated directly from the generated study summary. Experimental edge latencies are reported as context; the pass flag also includes the associated stability checks.
| Requirement | Measured | Acceptance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Report data | Not loaded | Generated study | PENDING |
Findings and method
Findings
- Quantified findings will appear when
report_data.jsis loaded.
How to read the comparison
- Original and proposed traces use the same case input and time base.
- The coherent and residual curves expose the proposed OSI evidence without adding another display-time decision rule.
- Diagnostic gain is context, not a substitute for measured stability evidence; its separate scale preserves authority detail.
- Unavailable arrays are omitted rather than replaced with zeros.